High res displays serve a different purpose on desktop than on mobile

I made the above point recently in response to an article bemoaning Microsoft’s improved high resolution screen handling being limited to the Metro interface only. I figured I’d reiterate it here for emphasis.

The reason small high res (e.g. 2560×1440 at 10.1″) mobile screens work is the fact that they’re handheld, which makes viewing tiny pixels easy. Try doing the same thing at desktop monitor range and you run into problems, mostly vision limitations.

The point of traditional large high res screens (e.g. 2560×1440 at 27″) in desktop usage is not to increase the number of pixels per element, but to allow more elements on the screen so that users can work with multiple applications/windows/documents simultaneously.

Combining the above 2 points: the motivation for high res is different for mobile as opposed to desktop. For mobile, it’s about close range visual crispness of the same amount of content shown on a lower resolution screen. For the desktop, it’s about showing more content than a lower resolution screen, period.


Author: jdrch

ISTJ, Rice Owl, UF Gator, mechanical engineer. STEM, sports, music, movies, humor. Account mine only & unaffiliated.

One thought on “High res displays serve a different purpose on desktop than on mobile”

  1. I want them both, which is why I delay buying the Dell U3011 which has 30″ with 2560×1600 pixels. I want 30″ with a higher resolution, so I’ll be able to read books with side-by-side page layout.Today I can do it on my 24″ display, but the pages are a little too small.



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s